totk feels like a chore

The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom is a monumental achievement in game design, a vast and intricate playground that expands upon its predecessor in breathtaking ways. Yet, for a significant portion of its player base, a persistent whisper has grown into a vocal critique: that playing the game can, at times, feel like a chore. This sentiment is not a dismissal of its quality but an examination of how its ambitious systems can inadvertently cross the line from engaging gameplay into repetitive obligation.

The Weight of a Vast World

The sheer scale of Hyrule in Tears of the Kingdom is its greatest strength and, for some, its primary source of fatigue. The game presents a triple-layered map of staggering size: the expansive Surface, the labyrinthine Depths, and the scattered Sky Islands. While this promises endless adventure, the practicalities of traversal often devolve into a time-consuming process. The Depths, in particular, exemplify this. Cloaked in near-total darkness, navigating them requires a constant expenditure of Brightbloom Seeds. Progress feels less like exploration and more like a slow, resource-draining march as players methodically light their path, often through visually repetitive biomes. The Zonai devices, while ingenious, frequently require time to construct and manage for basic travel, turning simple movement into a mini-puzzle that can interrupt the flow.

The Grind of Systems and Resources

Tears of the Kingdom’s core mechanics are built on a loop of collection and fusion. The Fuse ability is revolutionary, but its dependency on a near-constant scavenger hunt for materials underpins the chore-like feeling. Weapons are fragile, necessitating a perpetual search for new bases and monster parts to fuse. Upgrading the new Sage abilities or armor sets often demands quantities of specific items—Zonaite, Frox Guts, Captain Construct Horns—that require targeted farming. This shifts the player’s mindset from “I want to explore that mountain” to “I need to hunt ten more of these enemies to get the upgrade I want.” The game’s economy feels balanced around grinding, turning the open world into a checklist of resources to be gathered rather than a landscape of pure discovery.

Pacing and Interrupted Flow

The game’s structure can actively work against its own sense of adventure. Main story quests are frequently gated behind elaborate sequences that involve multiple steps of preparation, travel, and puzzle-solving. While each step may be enjoyable in isolation, the cumulative effect can feel like a list of errands. A quest to reach a distant Sky Island might involve finding a launch point, securing a vehicle design, gathering the correct Zonai devices to build it, and then finally executing the journey. The constant stopping and starting, the menu navigation for fusing and building, and the backtracking can fragment the narrative and emotional momentum, making the player acutely aware of the “work” required to progress.

The Paradox of Player Freedom

Interestingly, the very freedom the game champions contributes to the chore dynamic. With few explicit directives, players are left to define their own goals. In the absence of clear, urgent objectives, this freedom can morph into aimlessness or self-imposed task lists. The player may feel compelled to activate every Lightroot in the Depths, clear every enemy camp for parts, or complete every side adventure not out of driven curiosity, but out of a completionist’s sense of duty. The game provides the tools and the canvas, but the burden of creating a satisfying, efficient experience sometimes falls too heavily on the player, leading to optimization loops that feel more like labor than play.

Narrative Disconnect and Repetition

The non-linear storytelling, while ambitious, can dilute the sense of urgency and purpose. Recovering the memories of the Sages follows a similar pattern for each region, and the main dungeons, while improved, share structural similarities. This repetition of objectives—find the regional crisis, assist the Sage, infiltrate a temple, defeat a boss—can make the central narrative feel like a series of comparable tasks to be checked off. When combined with the resource grind, the overall experience risks becoming predictable, where the reward for overcoming one challenge is simply the introduction of the next, similar challenge.

Conclusion: A Masterpiece with a Cost

Labeling Tears of the Kingdom as a “chore” is an oversimplification, but the critique highlights a genuine tension within its design. It is a game of unparalleled scope and creativity that asks for a significant investment of time and patience. For many, that investment is repaid a hundredfold with moments of wonder and ingenuity. For others, the administrative overhead of managing its systems—the constant gathering, the brittle gear, the deliberate but slow traversal—overshadows the magic. It is a masterpiece that does not respect the player’s time in a conventional sense; it demands it, and in that demand, the line between immersive play and tedious obligation is often tested. Ultimately, whether the journey feels like a thrilling adventure or a beautiful chore depends on the player’s tolerance for its particular brand of structured freedom and systemic depth.

Trump says phone call with Putin "went very well"
Bangladesh creates divisions to modernize tax administration, boost revenue collection
Canada launches counter auto tariffs against U.S.
U.S. judge says Trump administration violates court order by deporting migrants to South Sudan
Japan begins 17th ocean discharge of Fukushima nuclear-tainted wastewater