horror movie oscars

Horror at the Oscars: A History of Overlooked Mastery

For nearly a century, the Academy Awards have served as the ultimate barometer of cinematic prestige, celebrating achievements in acting, directing, and technical craft. Yet, one genre has consistently found itself on the outside looking in, its artistic merits often overshadowed by its capacity to provoke fear and unease. The relationship between horror movies and the Oscars is a complex narrative of begrudging respect, shocking oversights, and rare, hard-won triumphs. While the genre has profoundly influenced global cinema and culture, its recognition by the Academy has been sporadic, revealing a deep-seated bias that equates terror with triviality.

The Academy’s historical reluctance to honor horror is rooted in the genre’s very purpose. Horror films confront audiences with primal fears, societal anxieties, and visceral reactions, elements often deemed less “worthy” than the emotional journeys of dramas or the intellectual rigor of historical epics. For decades, the Oscars have favored realism, biographical transformation, and overt social commentary, realms where horror, with its metaphorical and supernatural tendencies, seldom treads directly. This has created an environment where a horror film must often transcend its genre label to be considered for major awards, forced to be recognized as a “psychological thriller” or a “Gothic drama” to gain legitimacy.

Despite this institutional bias, horror has never been absent from the Oscars ceremony; its victories have simply been strategically compartmentalized. The Academy has long been comfortable rewarding the technical craftsmanship that makes horror so effective, acknowledging the elements that build the atmosphere of dread without necessarily endorsing the film’s core horrific nature. Makeup and Hairstyling, Sound Editing, and Visual Effects have been traditional footholds. Groundbreaking work in these categories is frequently found in horror, from the transformative practical effects of An American Werewolf in London (1981) to the chilling soundscape of The Exorcist (1973). These awards validate the genre’s technical innovation while often stopping short of acknowledging its holistic artistic vision.

The journey of horror into the upper echelons of Oscar recognition—the so-called “above-the-line” categories—has been arduous and punctuated by iconic moments that feel like exceptions proving the rule. The 1970s offered a brief glimpse of potential, with William Friedkin’s The Exorcist earning ten nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director, and winning for its Adapted Screenplay and Sound. It demonstrated that a film could be profoundly terrifying and be taken seriously as a cinematic landmark. Similarly, Jonathan Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs (1991) achieved the unthinkable, sweeping the “Big Five” awards (Best Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, and Screenplay). However, its classification is often debated; while containing horrific elements, many view it primarily as a psychological thriller, a distinction that arguably made its Oscar success more palatable to traditional voters.

The 21st century has seen a gradual, yet significant, shift in this dynamic. The expansion of the Best Picture nominee slate in 2009 opened doors for broader genres. This change paved the way for films like Black Swan (2010), a psychological horror-ballet hybrid that garnered five nominations and a win for Natalie Portman, and Get Out (2017), Jordan Peele’s seminal social thriller. Get Out’s success was a watershed moment. It received four nominations, including Best Picture, and won for Best Original Screenplay, making Peele the first African-American to win in that category. The film forced the Academy to confront horror not as a vehicle for cheap scares, but as a potent, urgent, and sophisticated medium for dissecting societal horrors—namely racism—in a way that conventional drama could not.

Recent years suggest a possible, though fragile, normalization. Films like The Shape of Water (2017), a dark fantasy horror-romance that won Best Picture, and Hereditary (2018), which was critically hailed but largely overlooked by the Academy, highlight the ongoing tension. More tellingly, the international scene has begun to exert pressure. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite (2019), a masterpiece blending horror, thriller, and black comedy, won Best Picture, signaling a global audience’s and Academy’s growing appetite for genre-blurring narratives where horror is a central, undeniable component. Similarly, the Swedish film Midsommar (2019) and the Australian production The Babadook (2014) have been widely cited in critical discourse as Oscar-worthy, despite their awards absence, further highlighting the gap between critical acclaim for horror and Academy validation.

The argument for horror’s Oscar worthiness is compelling. The genre demands a unique and rigorous directorial command over tone, pacing, and audience psychology. Performances in horror are exceptionally challenging, requiring actors to portray extreme states of terror, grief, and madness with a conviction that avoids caricature. From Toni Collette’s devastating portrayal of maternal despair in Hereditary to Lupita Nyong’o’s dual performance in Us (2019), horror consistently offers acting masterclasses that are routinely ignored. Furthermore, horror serves as an unparalleled vehicle for allegory, exploring themes of trauma, grief, social inequality, and political dread with a directness and potency that other genres temper.

The future of horror at the Oscars lies in continued genre evolution and voter education. As filmmakers like Ari Aster, Robert Eggers, and Jordan Peele continue to produce high-caliber, thought-provoking horror, and as the Academy’s membership diversifies in age and background, the outdated stigma continues to erode. The success of Get Out and the embrace of Parasite prove that the barrier is not impermeable. True parity will be achieved not when a horror film wins Best Picture by disguising itself, but when it is celebrated openly for everything that makes it a horror film: its ability to terrify, unsettle, and, ultimately, reveal profound truths about the human condition. Until then, the horror genre’s relationship with the Oscars remains one of cinema’s most compelling unresolved tensions—a story not of absence, but of recognition delayed.

Explainer: What to know about Japan's first female PM Takaichi's ascent to power?
Breaking precedent, S. Korean president visits Japan in strategic signal on ties
Asian leaders voice concerns over U.S. tariffs
Trump's conversation with European leaders triggers controversy
Israel, Iran exchange fresh strikes on 9th day of escalating conflict