carnal sins witcher 3 best choices

Table of Contents

I. Introduction: A Web of Deceit in Novigrad

II. The Core Investigation: Following the Clues

III. The Critical Confrontation: Hubert vs. Corinne

IV. The Aftermath and Consequences

V. Conclusion: The Weight of a Witcher's Judgment

The "Carnal Sins" quest in *The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt* stands as a masterclass in narrative design, presenting players with a complex murder mystery where the best choices are shrouded in ambiguity and moral grayness. Set in the sprawling city of Novigrad, this investigation begins with Geralt being hired by a coroner to track down a serial killer targeting sex workers. The quest expertly weaves together themes of prejudice, deception, and the nature of evil, challenging players to become true detectives rather than mere monster slayers. The pursuit of the "best" outcome is not about simple binary decisions, but about meticulous observation, critical thinking, and resisting the allure of a convenient scapegoat.

Geralt's investigation initially points toward a fanatical priest, who publicly condemns the victims and appears to have both motive and opportunity. This path offers a seemingly straightforward conclusion. However, the best choices in "Carnal Sins" require Geralt to look beyond the obvious. By thoroughly examining each crime scene with his Witcher Senses—noting the surgical precision of the wounds, the lack of defensive injuries, and the specific mutilations—Geralt gathers evidence that contradicts the narrative of a hate-fueled zealot. Speaking to witnesses like the troubled elf, Evelyn, and pursuing leads that seem tangential, such as the mention of a "doctor," are crucial steps. Rushing to accuse the priest based on circumstantial evidence is the primary trap this quest sets, and avoiding it is the first major key to unlocking its deeper, more rewarding narrative.

The quest's pivotal moment occurs at the Rosemary and Thyme, where the trail leads to two potential suspects: the distressed woman Corinne Tilly and the charismatic surgeon, Hubert Rejk. Here, the game presents its most significant test. Confronting Corinne, who is found with a bloody rag and acts suspiciously, feels like a natural culmination. Accusing her leads to a swift, violent end to the investigation. The superior choice, however, demands patience and trust in the gathered evidence. Believing Corinne's story—that she was tending to a wounded Evelyn—and asking for her help as a vision-touched medium redirects the investigation toward its true culprit. This decision underscores a central theme: evil often wears a pleasant face. Hubert, the well-spoken higher vampire masquerading as a doctor, is revealed only if Geralt refuses the easy answer.

Confronting Hubert Rejk unveils the quest's profound philosophical core. Unlike a mindless beast, Hubert is articulate, viewing his murders as a form of artistic expression and a sociological experiment on Novigrad's hypocrisy. The "best" choice in this confrontation is heavily debated. Letting Hubert go, as he proposes, spares a sentient being who promises to leave and never kill in the same pattern again, acknowledging a twisted code. Killing him delivers immediate justice for his victims. However, the most narratively consistent and impactful choice for Geralt is to reject his sophistry and execute him. This action confirms that intellectual justification holds no weight against premeditated, brutal murder. It completes the investigation properly, providing closure for the coroner and the city. Sparing Hubert, while a fascinating moral dilemma, feels antithetical to Geralt's role as a protector of the innocent, even if those innocent were marginalized by society.

The consequences of these choices resonate beyond the quest's conclusion. Accusing the priest or Corinne leaves the real killer free to continue his "work" elsewhere, a grim and unsatisfactory outcome. Successfully unmasking and defeating Hubert rewards Geralt with unique loot, experience, and the poignant satisfaction of having solved a complex case through deduction rather than brute force. It reinforces the idea that a Witcher's most vital tools are his intellect and judgment. Furthermore, it exposes the deep-seated societal sickness of Novigrad; the populace was all too ready to blame a fanatic or a frightened woman, ignoring the predator moving politely among them. The quest criticizes how prejudice blinds people to real danger.

"Carnal Sins" ultimately defines its best choices not through a clear good versus evil binary, but through a commitment to truth and thoroughness. The optimal path requires Geralt to be skeptical of convenient narratives, to value hard evidence over popular sentiment, and to follow the investigation to its logical end, regardless of how charming the culprit may be. It transforms Geralt from a reactive monster hunter into a proactive sleuth, making the player feel the weight of every deduction. The quest remains a standout moment in *The Witcher 3* because its morality is not handed to the player; it is earned through careful thought, making the victory over Hubert Rejk not just a physical battle, but a triumph of reason and integrity over deception and monstrous vanity.

Devastating earthquake in Myanmar claims over 1,000 lives, over 2,300 injuries
Iran rules out talks with European powers following snapback of UN sanctions
Trump's deportation blitz could shatter American business
Chinese rescuers continue search effort in quake-hit Mandalay
Feature: Relentless hardships erode hopes of displaced Gazans for peace