aoe best civ

Stand-alone game, stand-alone game portal, PC game download, introduction cheats, game information, pictures, PSP.

Table of Contents

Introduction: The Quest for the "Best"
The Pillars of Civilization Strength
Contenders for the Crown: A Tiered Analysis
The Meta and The Map: Defining the "Best"
Beyond the Tier List: Skill, Strategy, and Personal Preference
Conclusion: A Dynamic Definition

The question of the "best civilization" in the iconic real-time strategy game Age of Empires II is a debate as old as the game itself. Forums, community discussions, and professional commentary are perpetually alight with analysis, tier lists, and passionate arguments. However, declaring a single, unchallenged victor is an exercise in oversimplification. The concept of the "best" civ is inherently fluid, shaped by the evolving game meta, the specific map being played, the player's individual skill and strategy, and the format of the match. This exploration seeks not to provide a definitive answer, but to dissect the qualities that elevate civilizations and examine the leading contenders within the modern competitive landscape.

Civilization strength in Age of Empires II is built upon several interconnected pillars. A powerful economic bonus, such as the Vikings' free Wheelbarrow and Hand Cart upgrades or the Britons' cheaper Town Centers, provides a foundational advantage that compounds over time, leading to faster advancement and greater resource stockpiles. Military prowess is equally critical, often defined by unique units or impactful technologies. The Magyar fully upgraded Paladin, the Ethiopian archer firing faster, or the Frankish throwing axeman each define their civilization's military identity. Furthermore, versatility is a tremendous asset. Civilizations like the Chinese, with their broad tech tree and adaptable start, or the Byzantines, with their cheap counter-units and robust defenses, can react effectively to a wide array of strategies, making them less predictable and more resilient in varied situations.

Within the current competitive meta, a handful of civilizations consistently occupy the highest echelons of tier lists. The Franks are perennial favorites, particularly on open land maps like Arabia. Their faster foraging, free farm upgrades, and cheaper castles create a smooth and powerful economic and military curve, culminating in one of the game's strongest cavalry forces. The Mayans present a different model of excellence. Their longer-lasting resources, cheaper archers, and powerful Plumed Archer unique unit allow for dominant feudal and castle age pressure, often overwhelming opponents before the late game. For water map dominance, the Vikings are nearly uncontested. Their warship cost reduction and free economic upgrades grant an insurmountable naval and economic lead, though their late-game land options are more limited.

Other civilizations shine in specific niches. The Ethiopians, with their faster-firing archers and free pikeman upgrade, are archer-rush specialists. The Lithuanians, starting with extra food and benefiting from powerful relic-boosted cavalry, can execute devastating early aggression or scale into a late-game powerhouse. The Burgundians, with their unique economic technologies and powerful stable units, represent a high-risk, high-reward playstyle. Meanwhile, civilizations like the Britons with their extraordinary archer range, the Cumans with their early second Town Center potential, and the Huns with their stable-free housing remain formidable forces whose tier placement fluctuates with balance patches and strategic innovations.

The very definition of "best" is context-dependent. The optimal civilization for a fast-paced one-versus-one duel on the open map Arabia is rarely the best choice for a closed, tactical map like Arena or a chaotic four-versus-four team game. In team settings, civilizations are often chosen for their synergy. The Portuguese offering team gold from their feitoria, the Teutons providing garrison healing, or the Saracens granting team archer bonus damage against buildings become invaluable strategic assets, elevating their value far beyond their one-versus-one ranking. The game's meta is also in constant motion. A balance update that tweaks a unit's cost or a new strategy discovered by a top player can rapidly shift a civilization's standing from overlooked to overpowered, and vice versa.

Ultimately, raw civilization strength is merely a framework upon which player skill is built. A mid-tier civilization in the hands of a master who understands its timings and nuances will almost always defeat a top-tier civilization piloted by a less experienced player. Personal playstyle preference is a significant factor; a player who excels at patient booming and imperial age warfare may find the Khmer or Turks more "best" for them than the aggressive Mayans. Furthermore, mastery of core game mechanics—constant villager production, efficient resource gathering, precise unit control, and strategic scouting—will yield far greater returns than simply picking the highest-rated civ on a tier list. The civilization is a tool, and the player is the craftsman.

Therefore, the search for the single best Age of Empires II civilization is a captivating but ultimately endless journey. A more productive pursuit is understanding the attributes that contribute to strength: a smooth and powerful economy, a potent military identity, and strategic versatility. Civilizations like the Franks, Mayans, and Vikings exemplify these traits in their respective domains and thus consistently rank highly. However, the map, the game mode, the current meta, and, most importantly, the player's own skill and strategic inclination are the final arbiters. The true "best" civilization is the one that best aligns with the conditions of the match and the instincts of the person commanding its armies, proving that in Age of Empires II, strategic depth and player agency will always triumph over a static notion of supremacy.

Over 20 killed as bus plunges off cliff in Sri Lanka's Central Province
People-to-people, cultural exchanges propel development of SCO family
Trump suggests U.S. could "very soon" take actions against Venezuelan targets by land
At least 3 shot at immigration facility in U.S. state Texas
White House says U.S. in "armed conflict" with drug cartels

【contact us】

Version update

V9.86.670

Load more